There is an anecdote about Stalin who, before the astonished gaze of the crowd, grabbed a hen by the neck and began to pluck it alive. After he had undressed her, he threw grains of wheat at her, and let them go. The hen followed Stalin throughout the room to the surprise of everyone.
For a thorough understanding of what follows it is worth noting that Hitler was a spawn devised by _Skull & Bones, _ in order to eradicate from Europe any ideology or leadership that could be opposed to democracy. UK and USA allied with Stalin, democracy and communism is the same and as a consequence today we have a predominance of social democracy - democracy and socialism. In Spain: social and democratic state. Any opposition to the socialism-democracy tandem, it was labeled fascism, and is still done today, putting in the same bag Hitler, Mussolini or Franco, however, this is not done with Marxist-style leaders.
Lorenz von Stein, introduces the sozialstaat in order to avoid revolution. In his work highlights his History of the French Social Movements from 1789 to the Present (1850). The main thread of the Sozialstaat is the reform. Social reform as a vehicle that will impede the rise of low-strata social classes -Paul Iglesias calls them lumpen- through revolution through the implementation of a «Social Monarchy».
It can be deduced from the introduction the interest that the Spanish monarchy harbors to install in Spain by mandate a Social-Democratic State. A state that pursues the perpetuation of the monarchy in its Garden of the Hesperides, while sowing seeds of social rights that will be disseminated in time in order to avoid social outbreak; thus maintaining an imperishable status that is opposed by the absence of alternation to the natural evolutionary evolution of man.
The Practical Encyclopedic Dictionary Parramón, defines social democracy as: Name given to the ideological tendency and the set of political parties that advocate a gradual reformist evolution of the capitalist system, within a parliamentary democracy, to arrive at the implantation of socialism.
If we analyze how the parties that share power are mostly defined in Spain: PSOE and PP, we can see that the first one is undoubtedly -and this is how it expresses in its own acronyms- a socialist party. The second is self-defined since the second half of the nineties as a political organization of a reformist center, although the groups that precede it also have a centrist character. This is made clear by the PP in the second article of its statutes, it is not a right-wing party.
Said more simply: Spain is constituted by mandate of the monarch in a social and democratic state, that is, social-democratic. This is; tightening the rope to the taxpayer to unbearable limits for the development of a normal life, and for its reproduction. When the rope is so tense that you can sense the imminence of a social revolt - perhaps 15M - reforms are promised to calm the waters, some concession is made to appease the masses and once the oppressive path is followed by gradual strangulation . That is social democracy. The tandem that perpetrates it in Spain has been PP-PSOE (reformist-socialist). The new matches, you can see what they are, as phonies as the old ones, lie shamelessly without any shame and they shake the tail of the monarch. They came as a promise to dismiss the caste, but they are their allies and they are only interested in the armchair.
J. M. Mora
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario