CAUSE OF THE WESTERN AGONY (Inglés)

CAUSE OF THE WESTERN AGONY

     A proposition and its denial can not both be true at the same time and in the same sense. The incoherence of a ruled and ruling people is against us. Actually, democracy is really an instrument of coercion that confronts our freedom to be with the right to vote. It is a means used by the hegemonic power by means of which it is tried to laminate the process of liberation headed by a leader, arguing that this individual freedom is opposed to a supposed collective freedom of a democratic majority to choose who is a leader or not; who can it be or not be.

Democracy and communism are analogous propositions, both have always survived through war, slavery, genocide and lies, and where they have been applied and the more ideals have been presented in their forms; more misery, oppression and extermination have generated. These are ideologies of a deviant nature, only seek the attainment of power for the benefit of the ruler.

In Marxist subversion it is posed: why should no one have more than you? In the democrat: why should no one govern you? Both need the chaos in which to raise a new hierarchical structure even more oppressive. If democracy were a pigsty, the leaders would be the pigs, the people: the mud.

"To choose" means "to choose", comes from the Latin for the union of two particles: ex and colligeri; «Leave out» and «catch». The electoral process, could well be called the process of exclusion. Both actions are simultaneous and inseparable. Exclusion should not be a consecrated right. The right to vote must not exist. It is anti-human, it goes against the very nature of man in his most brilliant expression.

There are countless demagogues, journalists and journalists who defend as if it were a religion the benefits of democracy, against reality and objective truth; but: as intellectuals that you suppose !, what do you do defending that democracy is the final solution, indisputable and imperishable? No thinker of prestige would defend any reason as immovable and perpetual.

Above all other considerations, democracy is the right of exclusion. It is the right that we believe to have to annul in society those we do not like, perhaps only out of envy, because we believe they are better than us. Democracy is pure totalitarianism and its expression, for a long time, has the consequence of a real progromy. It is, of course, a priority imperative of any free man to fight against democracy, on the understanding that it is fundamentally a method for the practice of slavery and extermination. Not in vain, the infinite citations of authors, intellectuals of all times, in all fields of knowledge and of any tendencies, have greater depth of thought than those that are favorable to them; which is not surprising given that the democratic foundation is false from beginning to end.

There are three types of citizens in democracy: those who are deceived, those who are deceived and those who participate in the deception. Seventeen Presidents of the United States during eight decades did not abolish the slavery, it had to be a Civil War of four years that did it giving beginning to the Laws of Segregation that lasted for another century. Ten of the first eighteen US Presidents were owners and exploiters of hundreds of slaves each, thousands in total.

It is fanaticism to take for good that regime that accommodates our government convictions regardless of their results. The homo democraticus should be so perfect that when achieved such magnificence could be commuted by the autocráticus. It would be a joy to live under the regime of such a beautiful soul. But, if we have lost faith in man to the point of preferring to govern by an elective system, how can we aspire to an immaculate democracy by a homo superioris? An idealized regime that depends on a super-humanity, translates into supremacism. This aspiration, through the axiomatic dialogue, constitutes a genocidal totalitarianism that elevates Nazism to a mere anecdote.

Democratic demagoguery raises: doublethink, neolanguage, Marxism, gender ideology, deconstruction, moral relativism, uncertainty principle ... simple logorrhea with formal appearance. In that chaos, they clearly define the confrontation: rich-poor, man-woman, homo-hetero, revolution-conservation, father-son, penis-vulva, State-Church, religion-ideology ... Creating disorder and confrontation with the democrat only has left thrive on the destruction of others.

It is false that the democratic framework embraces any ideology while he himself is only a kind of game rules. The truth is that democracy is an ideology that does not admit positions confronting its axioms. Who intends, with intellectual honesty, the regeneration of democracy as a solution to the evils that are inherent to it; he has not understood the substratum of this ideology. The majority is the cause of the democratic legitimacy as the infinity of its texts is of its argumentation, as swollen with hollow verbiage as the middle voter vacuums.

In the Orb, since the year 1700 there are around 100 million deaths in armed conflicts. With the approval, for the first time, of the abortion in the USSR of Lenin in 1920, there have been 1,500 million intrauterine murders. What a monstrosity! A democrat is nothing more than a mass murderer of refined and extraordinarily effective methods. But, if you see that your country is in trouble and nobody does anything to solve them, perhaps you are the one who must provide the solutions. If you decide, take care of the democrats, leave in diapers the communist genocide.

The Democrats believe that Franco's tomb is intolerable, but of the Royal Crypt in the Monastery of El Escorial, with twenty-seven corpses of Bourbons and Hasburg, he says nothing. His style is to consider that the crucifixion of Jesus Christ was an abuse on the part of Jesus Christ who was a: cool, fascist, macho and a vacilón, as well as capitalist and Francoist. This leveling peat provokes the individual that stands out: by envy, by stranger -in conquest or defense-, by stupidity or by genetic survival. This attack forces the sublimation that increases envy in a vicious circle that ends with exhaustion, death or the victorious imposition on the oppressive mass granting humanity the spark of freedom and life, opening a human path.

Feminism, egalitarianism, anti-capitalism, antifascism, communism, democracy ... They share a common goal: to steal, kill and enslave, their longing is power for power itself. When the democrat imposes his concept of justice the atrocities multiply, then only the peril prevails who can. Democracy is aporia. The democrat states that why we can not wander the streets naked and jumping to the leg while playing the violin, that if we can not do that means there is no freedom but heteropatriarcado.

Authoritarianism? No, the true leader-far from the current definition of the RAE-is in self-defense -by the mass man-. When it is authentic, it invests all its energy in surviving, safeguarding the lives and interests of others. What is granted, no doubt, has earned it well.

Democracy is science, the opposite is humanity. The pretension to transform the metaphysics of freedom into a methacrylate urn and an endless number of pages is the maximum expression of deception. The right that men arrogate themselves to choose to others is the same indignity, active and passive. A remnant of slavery, an inhuman moral deviation. Marxism removes property, shoots the nape of the neck and makes slaves. Democracy denies property, denies birth and makes numbers. You have taken to such an extreme the democratic revolution that the revolutionary is to be conservative. And conserving only itself, the Bourbon restoration of '75 has used democracy to destroy the moral and cultural traditions of Spain. If they are convinced that God does not exist, what do they care if we think of him?

Democracy is the delivery of illusion of power to cowards. The maximum deception and the jail of the people. Prisoner of malice. Democracy annuls and establishes as a crime the precise characteristic that distinguishes humans from other animals: the being, the conscience. The Prince is not exempt from this annulment when he cohabits with or uses it. Neither the democrat is necessarily good for being a democrat nor is the dictator necessarily a tyrant for being a dictator. Democracy is the desert, death, nothingness.

Democracy means organized revolution, its consequences are: disorder, death, theft, abuse of power, slavery and degradation with a formal appearance. If we have guns in front of Congress and we shoot at discretion, they will run to grab the sacks of the treasury and shout: no if my money!

The practice of democracy is a sequel to slavery inasmuch as it presupposes the right that men arrogate to themselves to choose others, even when they are treated for the highest privilege. Twice this formula has sprung up throughout history: the first in Ancient Greece, the second in the United States. In both cases they were slave societies. It is no more than a religious belief, its God is The People, everything that is executed through democratic means will be accepted by the Empire; even the most delirious madness.

Of how democracy and war are united as much as any other regime gives History a good account. And if someone says: No, they fought against totalitarianism. We must question who is naive? Educate in democracy? No, please, democracy is the lack of education. Educate in anti-democracy, know how to value the good, not what the majority says; and keep in mind that war has been the form of expansion of the Empire on the two occasions in which democracy has appeared in history: both in the archaic Athens and in the USA. UU

J. M. Mora