AXIOMS ​​OF DEMOCRATIC IDEOLOGY (Inglés)

AXIOMS ​​OF DEMOCRATIC IDEOLOGY

1. Democracy is The Government of the People:

That is, the People govern themselves. Appealing to low passions, the illogical axiom deals with the seditious subversion of the mass. If the people can self-govern, why should anyone govern you? In the Marxian analogy it is; Why should no one have more than you? Both questions follow an interest, which stems from the subsequent uprising and anarchy. It is in itself the perpetration of the necessary chaos, gathering primary instincts, so that the seditious; perfectly organized, they rise up in a new hierarchical structure; making clear that the ideological premise: The Government of the People, is false.

2. Democracy is Freedom:

The concepts of Democracy and Freedom are deliberately related. But, Democracy is an arithmetical imposition, which identifies the Majority with Freedom. In Democracy, everything is reduced to a duality: the free man in front of the man who chooses the man. How can one affirm then that democracy is freedom, when it is precisely the opposite? If we identified an object with a certain ideology, and another object with the opposite, we could be represented in this way. However, the object, or its opposite, lack human capabilities. Therefore, when we opt for an ideology, we vote for its representative, that is, for a human being, and it is not different to choose a human being to be a slave than to do it to govern, because the demeaning action is that some men are created with right to choose other men, even if the latter voluntarily submit to the process; and that those who wish to be something determined can not be it by themselves, but by the choice of others.

3. The majority criterion must prevail:

Nothing influences the reason or judgment when making a decision, but this will be preferred by the majority. Without going to assess what majority is, the only thing that matters is that there are many. According to this criterion, let's say that we suffer on Earth an invasion of another planet, with the devastating spirit of humanity. Being very superior in number, we kindly grant them the right of Suffrage, and we adjust ourselves to the criterion of the majority. Even when we enter a process of extinction, as a consequence of the economic measures of the invading government, we will continue to defend democracy because, in the end, the extraterrestrials are part of the people. It will be understood that it is completely absurd to base decisions on the criterion of the majority; especially in Spain today in which there is an investment in the birth rate, so that more die than they are born, a phenomenon that is not punctual but has followed this direction for four decades.

4. The right of Universal Suffrage:

The right to vote contains two rights; active and passive, that is; to choose and to be chosen. However, once again, if we attend to the concept of choosing, whether actively or passively, what is not repaired is the significance of the act of choosing; by which, indissociably, it is included and excluded simultaneously. And why should we grant any human being the right to exclude another human being through his representative? The exclusion must not be an authorized right, because when it is done based on an arithmetic superiority it supposes the height; of inequality, of the absence of freedom, of injustice and lack of humanity, according to which man has the right to defend his physical and mental integrity, and his freedom to be what he desires, emancipating himself from the will of the most.

5. Democracy is not an Ideology:

Precisely, avoiding that Democracy is an ideology is a basic principle of totalitarianism; because in this way you avoid that your axioms can be discussed or questioned. If democracy is not an ideology, it is not the imposition of the will of anyone, but a construct that exists by spontaneous generation. It is even compared to democracy with a vegetable, which must be watered daily so that it does not wilt, as if it were a fruit of nature and not a concatenation of ideas of man, that is, of a metaphysics created by man, which has no form in living matter or inert matter but in human consciousness. And as such, it is an ideology, and as an ideology that must necessarily be confronted by a different ideology, with different postulates and principles that can liberate the human being from democratic totalitarianism.

6. Waiver of the Right to Be in Favor of the Right to Suffrage:

Benjamin Franklin, who is considered the founding father of the USA, despite not being a signer of the Declaration of Independence, has two clear phrases: Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting to decide what to eat; and freedom is the lamb, well armed, challenging the vote. Whereas in the other sentence it says: Those who would renounce an essential freedom, to buy a little momentary security, do not deserve; neither freedom nor security, and they will end up losing both. And what greater essential freedom than that of Being? Being, what each one wants to be, emancipated from the will of others, within morality; and therefore not limited in their free will, by the majority decision of those who arrogate to themselves the right to choose.

7. Democracy is the establishment of rules for dialogue with any ideological approach:

Indeed, it is among other things the establishment of rules for dialogue, of course always leaving aside any exposition that opposes the democratic axioms. In this sense the phrase of a prominent political commentator, habitual of television programs, is very illustrative, in which he says literally, in one of his live interventions: ... all ideas in democracy are defensible, even if they are not reasonable, and democracy, which prevents those ideas that attempt against democracy itself, do not progress ... That is, according to this fundamentalist democratic ideology, if a human being is systematically and objectively; excluded, vexed, outraged or vilified by majority decisions, is unable to defend itself, since for more arguments to expose, accusing the democratic regime of their misery, their voice will be drowned by the will of the masses. And this is called: the establishment of dialogue rules. But it is a sterile dialogue, since it is included within an axiomatic framework that restricts the essential freedom of the human being to defend his own integrity, forcing him to submit to the decision of the majority, even when this goes against his own existence.

8. Democracy is Equality:

Nature makes men different. It is nature that determines the defense skills, which allow the survival of men, so that if there are human beings who possess abilities that surpass those of others, these others have the advantage of being more numerous; being compensated, in this way, the evolution of the existence of all. However, the axiomatic imposition professed in the democratic ideology; that makes the quantitative quality prevail over the qualitative one, is in essence the establishment of the inequality of right; inasmuch as those who are less must submit to the will of the majority, producing the helplessness of those who are not guilty or to be less, or to be more skilled, since these characteristics have already been established by nature. We are all born with given circumstances, and the fact of being born is in itself equality. Inequality is established by man when he gives advantages, additional and artificial, to those who have been born with the involuntary characteristic of being more numerous.

9. The problems of Democracy, are solved with more democracy:

It is the height of fundamentalism, in which not only axioms are established; but that although they do not admit discussion about them, it is intended that the problems of this system; unjust, irrational, totalitarian and genocidal will be solved with more of the same, that is, implementing even more its postulates, and therefore the pernicious consequences of them.

10. Democracy has evolved:

From Pericles, suppose that democracy has evolved a lot, however, what is in the origin: remains. At the origin of democracy; there is inequality, there is slavery, there is discrimination and so many other damages. As for this theoretical evolution, suffice it to say that in the USA, slaves were not released from their condition until the end of the 20th century, given that although the suppression of slavery occurred in the second half of the 19th century, it was replaced by the beginning of segregation laws. In addition, the ideologues of democratic fundamentalism arrogate to themselves the exclusivity of evolution, denying this ability to anyone who does not agree with their postulates, and those who consider cavemen.

J.M. Mora